The natural course of prostate cancer is very
variable. Aggressive prostate cancers usually require radical treatment (total
removal of the prostate OR radiation of the entire prostate), which has been
shown to be associated with a clear overall survival benefit. However, despite
radical treatments being very effective, they can be associated with side
effects. These are mainly incontinence and impotence.
On the other hand PSA screening for prostate
cancer often leads to the detection of less aggressive cancers, which are
unlikely to cause them any harm. These less aggressive cancers can be put under
an active surveillance protocol, without the need for immediate radical
treatment. In an active surveillance protocol patients are monitored closely
with serial PSA checks and repeat prostate biopsy. The stringent monitoring
informs the clinician if the cancer has changed its nature to a more aggressive
form, at which point a radical treatment can be advocated. As a result
unnecessary side effects are avoided in these patients. Some patients may
however perceive this as the clinician "doing nothing" despite the diagnosis of
cancer, which may cause them significant psychological distress. Furthermore
there is no accurate way to assess the "true" aggressiveness of the cancer by
means of physical investigation and biopsy only. As a result a significant
proportion of patients opt for immediate radical treatment.
Focal therapy is a relatively novel treatment option, which closes the gap
between active surveillance and overtreatment with radical therapy in early
stage prostate cancer.